What the IRS Reversal on Tax Reimbursement Clauses in IDGTs Means
The Key Wealth Institute is a team of highly experienced professionals representing various disciplines within wealth management who are dedicated to delivering timely insights and practical advice. From strategies designed to better manage your wealth, to guidance to help you better understand the world impacting your wealth, Key Wealth Institute provides proactive insights needed to navigate your financial journey.
The office of the chief counsel of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) recently made a 180-degree reversal of the agency’s long-held position on tax reimbursement clauses in grantor trusts. The move could have significant tax implications for those who use the trusts as wealth transfer and tax information tools.
The gift-tax consequence of modifying an irrevocable grantor trust to add a tax reimbursement clause is at issue. Such a clause provides the trustee the discretionary power to reimburse the grantor for the tax paid on the trust’s taxable income.
Background on IDGTs
Many clients create intentionally defective grantor trusts (IDGTs) and contribute highly appreciating assets for the ultimate benefit of children or descendants. With an IDGT, the grantor or settlor pays income tax on the trust’s assets in order that those assets grow as rapidly as possible.
The trusts are intentionally defective because they remove assets from the grantor’s gross estate. But the trust includes grantor powers that allow the income generated to be taxed to the original grantor rather than the trust beneficiaries.
These tax payments amount to tax-free gifts to the beneficiaries that bypass any annual or lifetime gift exclusion. This status allows the trust assets to appreciate without being depleted by income tax payments. Therefore they result in additional wealth transferred to the trust beneficiaries.
In time, the grantor may no longer wish to be burdened by the income taxes attributable to the IDGT. Those who draft the trusts often include provisions to allow for ways that the grantor trust status can be toggled on or off.
The trust may reimburse the grantor for income taxes paid at the trustee’s discretion. With the discretionary method, the assets of the trust remain outside the grantor’s estate. But if the grantor opts for mandatory reimbursement, the full value of the trust’s assets could be included in the grantor’s gross estate, under IRC section 2036.
That’s because the grantor has effectively retained the right to use the trust to pay an income tax obligation.
Irrevocable trusts generally cannot be changed or modified unless all the trust beneficiaries agree. A trust can seek a judicial modification granting the independent trustee the discretion to reimburse a settlor for tax payments attributable to income generated by the trust’s assets.
Alternatively, a trust can be decanted into a new trust with different provisions, including a discretionary tax reimbursement clause.
Reversal of the IRS’ Prior Position
In a 2016 private letter ruling (PLR 201647001) the IRS concluded that adding a tax reimbursement clause after the trust’s creation was merely administrative in nature. The modification did not result in a change of beneficial interests in the trust. The clause allowed the trustee to reimburse the grantor for taxes paid on trust income. As a result, the reimbursement wouldn’t be considered a taxable gift.
Late last year, however, the IRS released a chief counsel advice ruling (CCA 202352018) stating that the conclusions of the previous PLR “no longer reflect the position of this office.”
The ruling asserts that a beneficiary makes a taxable gift by consenting (or not objecting) to adding a tax reimbursement clause to an existing trust. The CCA concludes that the modification resulted in a “relinquishment of a portion of the beneficiaries’ interest in the trust.”
The ruling concedes that the valuation of the gift is difficult to determine. The valuation is contingent upon the trustee’s future use of the discretionary power to reimburse the grantor for income taxes attributable to the trust’s income.
Note that this is distinguishable from including a trustee’s discretionary tax reimbursement clause in a trust’s original governing instrument, which would not include the assets in the gross estate for federal estate tax purposes. Revenue ruling 2004-64 offers guidance for when a reimbursement clause is included from the trust’s inception. The CCA’s conclusion applies to trusts that are modified to add a discretionary trustee power to reimburse.
Implications of the Reversal
This new IRS guidance has implications that will force us to rethink the possible gift tax consequences of amending, modifying, and decanting irrevocable trusts. The shift may disrupt existing estate plans that relied on the previous understanding of tax reimbursement clauses.
Advisors and clients would be wise to carefully consider the implications of any transaction that alters the terms of an irrevocable trust that would be seen to alter beneficial interests and potentially result in a taxable gift.
For more information, please contact your advisor.
About Tina A. Myers
In her role, Tina Myers is responsible for managing the Central Planning Team and overseeing the Key Wealth Institute and any financial planning content distributed. She works with our Regional Planning Strategists to help facilitate our best thinking and advice delivery to clients.
Before joining Key, Tina worked in the public accounting industry, where she focused on taxes, specifically individual, trust, estate, and gift tax planning. She also held roles at a small public accounting firm, a regional firm, and the private client group of a large multinational firm.
Tina earned an M.Tax from Virginia Commonwealth University and holds several industry-standard licensures. She received the Circle of Excellence Award for Key Private Bank in 2016 and 2018. She was selected to attend the 2024 Key Wealth Education Symposium, which recognizes top performance and extraordinary commitment to serving our clients and growing our business.